See replies:
In fact, during the decade I spent as a homeless camper in the progressive enclave of Boulder, CO I found that I could relate to people of all races and ethnic groups and economic circumstances. Bottom line for me: Every group has a few good people in it, along with a few bad, and most fall somewhere in between perfectly good and irredeemably bad.
Regarding this latest kerfuffle involving Boulder City Council, a reader of my blog left the following comment:
Gee whiz. I’m a Boulder resident, have been since I was 11 years old, in 1980. I went to school here. I found Nagle’s comments consistent with historical fact, and I agree with her that this discussion about “privilege” is onerous. It just divides people. Aren’t progressives constantly talking about “coming together”? From what I’m reading, no one on Council barred people of a different hue, or sex from putting themselves forward as mayor. Two men happened to do so. No women did so. We’ve had female mayors before. So, even if we got one this time around, it would not be some breakthrough.
I was bothered reading the article that the City has been having a relationship with the Government Alliance on Race Equity, with the apparent ideology it’s pushing of calling some people “privileged,” and some not, just based on their genitals and skin color. If people need an education about what is really represented by “equity” in these organizations, I encourage them to listen to what Benjamin Boyce and/or Bret Weinstein have to say about it. It is not what it appears to be for many.
I sincerely mean what I expressed in the title of this post, too. I’m too old and too tired to get angry at FAKE progressives, but that doesn’t mean I’ll permit their wrongheaded notions to go unchallenged . . .
— MRW